Case Study: If Your People Survey Results Are Dreadful, What Should You Do?
Updated: Feb 15
The setting for this Organizational Effectiveness project was a Firm that spanned across seven states, 120 partners, and 1500 employees.
The Regional Managing Partner—when relatively new to the region—was handed some pretty dreadful People Survey data, which showed his region to be the poorest performing region in the United States.
These results were wholly unacceptable to a firm that aspired to be the world's premiere professional service firm.
The region was being taken to task for its survey results in such areas as integrity, teamwork, mutual respect, and accountability.
The Regional Managing Partner (RMP) would settle for nothing less than having himself and his partners live the Firm's Core Values on a daily basis.
The view was that the partners must accept total ownership of the historic problems and of the ultimate solution.
The RMP expected substantial progress within 18 months.
The first step was to conduct an Organizational Audit—one-on-one interviews were conducted with 45 partners and 85 staff members.
The powerful findings were cascaded throughout the region—at first the RMP was given a day-long briefing; then all partners attended a one-day retreat; and finally, a 30-page distillation of the findings was presented to every staff member.
The RMP was coached on how to converts his command-and-control management style to a more collaborative and empowering style.
The professional staff was invited into the change process, and several dozen of them volunteered for sports on the three Task Forces that were constituted—Core Change Teams. Partners participated on all Teams, but none was led by a partner.
The Core Change Teams identified eight fundamental themes; all deliverables were based on these eight themes; and each of the themes had a combination of short-, intermediate-, and long-term solutions.
Prior to the launch of the eight thematically-driven initiatives, the Core Change Teams presented their findings and recommendations to the entire region, in a series of presentations.
The Core Change Teams identified 55 objectives, and 48 were accepted—30 short-term, 10 intermediate-term, and 8 long-term.
The seven that were not accepted were cited, and a specific reason was given—most were already being implemented in a similar form.
Two years later progress was assessed—substantial progress had been made on a host of fronts.